Regional cooperation is THE issue

http://fdhub.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/zism9c.jpg

It was true last year.

It’s true today: Lack of regional cooperation lies at the heart of many of Richmond’s problems. And, it’s getting worse all the time because it’s costing taxpayers’ money in a time when governments all over the commonwealth are dealing with shortfalls.

Eventually, greater regional cooperation is bound to come about for the Richmond metropolitan area. One day, it will happen simply to save money on duplication of services.

Given the checkered history the concept has in these parts — together with Virginia’s peculiar set-up, which has independent cities landlocked without the ability to expand — and you know it’s still going to take an altogether fresh approach in leadership to make it happen.

Like it, or not, the Commonwealth of Virginia’s capital city needs the enthusiastic cooperation of Chesterfield County and Henrico County in order to build a modern mass transportation system for the Greater Richmond Community. That isn’t going to change.

Whether folks in Short Pump like it or not, that transportation system’s main hub will need to be in the city, probably as close to Main Street Station as it can be.

Likewise, Richmond needs the cooperation of the surrounding counties to plan a sensible baseball stadium for the imaginary minor league team that will someday call it home. By the way, so far, the counties of Henrico and Chesterfield won’t touch the Shockoe Bottom deal with a ten-foot pole.

In the future it’s going to be more and more difficult to provide clean water, proper schools, adequate fire and police departments, and all sorts of costly but unavoidable budget items, without genuine cooperation from all the governments of the metropolitan area.

The question is: How long will it take?

Since the densely populated suburban counties have developed — to some extent — on the backs of those who moved there hoping to avoid dealing with urban problems, their elected officials are accustomed to being automatically against most boundary-blurring notions.

Furthermore, the City of Richmond’s officials are accustomed to looking at the counties as lesser-than entities. For instance, the Board of Directors of the Richmond Metropolitan Authority, which was formed in 1966, has 11 members. Six of those members are appointees from the City of Richmond. Chesterfield and Henrico have two each. The eleventh is appointed by the Commonwealth of Virginia’s Transportation Commissioner.

The RMA owns and operates The Diamond, the Expressway, and several other things. If you want to see all of what the RMA does, click here. My own sense of this body is that in the future the counties will need more representation. Acting together, Henrico and Chesterfield ought to be at least equal to the City’s delegation in number. Shouldn’t Hanover County be included, as well?

While the RMA has paved the way for cooperation, it can‘t be expected to reform itself. Its members get their direction from the governments that appoint them. Unfortunately, some of those officials who make policy are stuck in tradition like its cement. They just go on fighting old battles.

So, from here on the real push for more regional cooperation is likely to have to come from the bottom up, instead of the top down. It’s going to take an informed citizenry to sweep another us-pitted-against-them attitude, leftover from the days of Massive Resistance, onto history’s compost heap.

It’s time to let all that go. Hopefully, Richmond’s new mayor, Dwight Jones, will not carry on the “my way or the highway” style his predecessor used in such matters.

In the Richmond metro area, we’re all facing hard times. We’re all hoping not to lose too much of what has been sweet about our way of life. We’re all looking at a future suddenly less certain, a future that will surely call upon us to change, to be smarter with our limited resources.

This screed isn’t proposing we do away, altogether, with jurisdictional boundaries. It is proposing that the changes we are going to have to make, aren’t going to take place until we — meaning “we” the people — get started looking for every way this metro area can invest wisely in crafting greater regional cooperation.

This should be the year the million people living in or near Richmond take great strides toward learning to look out for what are their mutual best interests. “We” need to act to push our so-called “leaders” toward more regional cooperation, pronto.

– Words and art by F.T. Rea

Posted in Features, RVANews-politics, Schools

3 Comments.

  1. Excellent commentary, Terry! Thank you very much for your cogent and compelling argument.
    Maybe 2009 will be the year when something of
    real substance happens. Hope springs eternal!

    Along the same line of your piece is a commentary that appeared in the RTD on New Year’s Day. The response to the op-ed has been enormous, unlike anything I’ve experienced in my 38-year career. Citizens want to be part of a citizen-based regional planning process—as they should and must!

    Again, many thanks!

    Below is the companion commentary:

    Will Good Ship Richmond Sink or Sail?

    JOHN V. MOESER TIMES-DISPATCH
    Published: January 1, 2009

    This year ushered in some of the most climatic events in U.S. history. We’ve experienced profound progress as well as record-setting losses. Chief among the former, of course, was the election of our nation’s first African-American president. Equally astonishing was that Virginia, the birthplace of Massive Resistance, was key to the Obama victory.
    Unfortunately, President-elect Barack Obama faces economic crisis unrivaled since the Great Depression. This year we witnessed the collapse of once-venerable financial institutions, the near bankruptcy of the legendary American auto industry, huge drops in personal and institutional wealth, and budget cuts at state and local levels of government that have yet to bottom out. Old verities have been found wanting. The nation, the world itself, is experiencing social and economic change unmatched in many generations.

    Richmond also is changing. It too has been challenged. But what about our ship of state? The good ship Metro Richmond was built to withstand storms that would doubtless sink most other vessels. Given its majesty, one would think the ship would be at sea, piercing the highest waves and strongest of winds as it plowed forward to places other ship could never reach. Unfortunately, it remained safely anchored in harbor, where it has been for decades.

    This stately and historic lion of the sea ventured out a bit over the past year, but never into open water, and only then for brief harbor tours. Beyond the fact that it never sails, the ship is under the command of multiple captains. This bizarre command structure is bad enough, but it’s even worse when the captains argue among themselves. The captains agree only on one thing: that it is safer for the passengers if the ship remains at port and avoids the dangers of the sea . Of course, this kind of consensus prevents the passengers from ever reaching their destination.

    IT’S BEEN JUST over a year since the release of Crupi Report II, the highly publicized report completed by James Crupi and funded by the business community. Crupi was commissioned to re-examine the Richmond metropolitan area he had studied 15 years earlier and make recommendations that would lead to a new and improved ship of state.

    After his first visit to Richmond, he issued a report that told us what we didn’t want to hear; namely, this once magnificent ship, built with the finest of materials, was not only stuck in the harbor, but beginning to rot and slowly sink because of our refusal to remove the decades-long buildup of racial and political incrustations. Unless we put aside our differences and all pitched in to refit the ship, overhaul the dysfunctional layers of command, commission new leadership to set sail for sea, head to major ports throughout the world, and venture forth toward unexplored opportunities, the ship we all loved was simply going to sink deeper into the harbor’s mud.

    Our ship was falling apart while the sleek and powerful vessels of other regions were plying the oceans and returning to their harbors with holds full of prosperity and promise. We too could do the same, he said, but we had to wake up from our lethargy, confront our fears, and refuse to let those with no vision, but with plenty of petty self-interest, pull us in different directions and, in the process, drag us all down.

    THAT WAS 15 years ago. After Crupi returned to Richmond and interviewed 110 unidentified business, political, and community leaders, his next trip, much ballyhooed by the Chamber and the local press, was for the purpose of presenting his findings. People assembled at the Siegel Center with eager anticipation. Crupi told us, however, that our ship was still moored in the harbor. We had made progress, for sure. We had scraped the barnacles, repaired the multiple leaks, reconditioned the engines, redecorated many of the state rooms, and celebrated along with the queen the building of our first tiny boat 400 years ago. But . . . we were still in port and content with harbor tours. Our ship had yet to see the ocean!

    Crupi admonished us to chart our course and prepare to set sail. He didn’t use those words. Rather, he said we needed to “create a 2015 Metro Future Task Force led by a business leader and give it a 12-month deadline to come up with a vision and plan for the region.”

    Over this past year, our refitted ship didn’t go anywhere. Despite a better-equipped vessel, we’re still stuck with the same dysfunctional government. We’re still stuck with multiple captains, each responsible for a different deck, or for going only in one direction. Unfortunately, the business community is just about as leaderless as the region’s body politic.
    What are we to do? I say that it is time for a mutiny! After all, who paid for this ship? The citizens! To whom are elected officials ultimately accountable? Citizens! Who buys the goods and services that build and expand our businesses? The people of Richmond! Isn’t it time that the leadership for planning Metropolitan Richmond be placed in the hands of the men and women living in the region?

    Good citizens of Richmond, let’s take over this ship. If we don’t, we’ll never get to our destination. Instead of the business community, or some group of government officials, or a “blue ribbon” panel selected by a small cadre of insiders telling us how and when we’re going to get started, let’s send out a call to people from every walk of life, and who reside in Richmond city, Henrico, Chesterfield, Hanover, Ashland, Goochland, Powhatan, Charles City, and New Kent to join hands as fellowRichmonders and do for the region what we did when we developed the Downtown Master Plan.

    IT WAS CITIZENS who crafted the most forward-thinking plan yet devised for downtown. It was citizens from the city and the suburbs who said they wanted a downtown built for people, a place inviting to those who like to walk and bike, a place of commerce and government interspersed with places of tree-lined parks with open vistas and walkways to the river, a place full of life both day and night, and a place that invited people from across Central Virginia to enjoy its beauty and vitality.

    Whenever I have participated with a group of citizens to discuss the future of Richmond, whenever people are afforded the opportunity to plan their own destination — namely, the kind of city that we want for our children and our children’s children — always what I hear is that people want a community that transcends political boundary, race, income, religion, nationality.

    They want a city where people live together in integrated neighborhoods, go to school together, work together, and enjoy life together. They want a city that embraces the whole region and where people everywhere in this metropolis are proud to call themselves, “Richmonders.”

    Do we have that today in Central Virginia? We do here and there, in some exceptional neighborhoods, but, as a rule, we don’t. And why don’t we? Well, I think it’s because we haven’t yet experienced a mutiny.

    By the way, harbor tours are now operating at reduced price.

    John V. Moeser is emeritus professor of Urban Studies and Planning at VCU, and Senior Fellow, Bonner Center for Civic Engagement, at the University of Richmond. Contact him at jmoeser@richmond.edu .

    John

    John Moeser @ January 6th, 2009 at 11:36 am

  2. That is nice pie in the sky theory, but will the counties pay into their idea of equal representation? The City is owed more than $80 million in debt issued by the RMA.

    Will the counties agree to shoulder some of that debt in return for equal representation? If they don’t, why would anyone in the city favor giving them equal representation where they could then control the RMA and spending, thus delaying our debt repayment? Is that really cooperation or Richmond getting stepped on like we always used to?

    Tom @ January 6th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

  3. John,

    Thanks for the kind words. I read your New Year’s Day piece when it came out. Of course, I agreed with what you had to say. Enjoyed the stretched nautical metaphor.

    Nice to hear from you.

    Tom,

    “…Like we used to?”

    I don’t follow you on that. Used to in what way? When?

    FTRea @ January 6th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

3rd Column

RVABlogs »

  • ::
  • ::
  • ::
  • ::
  • ::
Once Upon a Vine