Public Art: Monuments spawn reactions

leemon09display1a.JPG

Photo taken morning of Feb. 2

What did the artist mean?

When the art is eye-catching, when it invites the mind to engage, we inevitably search for meaning.

When the art is out in the public way it is constantly asking for our opinions. It must stand for our questions.

As I walk about in my neighborhood, along with the displays people put out on their front porches and such, I see the bronze statues of Confederate States of America heroes up on marble pedestals on Monument Avenue every day.

What did those statues mean when they were installed? What might they mean to people looking at them now. Yes, I think about those things sometimes. And, why not?

While, what was intended by the creators of art and what the public will make of it later are two different things, both things matter. With public art the reaction is usually all that matters, regardless of what the artist may have intended. In the art gallery world the artist’s statement, which sometimes includes their intentions, carries some weight. Not so much on the street.

As you read this — until they come down, for whatever reasons — there is an unfolding statement that’s being made by someone here in Richmond. Displays are up at the Jefferson Davis and the Robert E. Lee monuments.

My photo of the display facing east, at Allen Avenue (Lee) is at the top.

jeffdavis2a.jpg

I took the photos of the Davis monument display on Saturday afternoon. The box you see above can be seen in the photo below, too. It’s in the shadow on the base, also facing east. Don’t know if this is still there, or not.

jeffdavis1a.jpg

The boxes don’t seem to be damaging the monuments, unless one chooses to take umbrage that they are there at all. Certainly other displays have been left off at the foot of the Lee monument, frequently they have to do with his birthday or some important date from the Civil War Era. Over the years I can remember, 50 or so, the monuments on Monument Avenue have rarely been harmed.

When I was in hight school someone spray-painted “Rat” a few times on the base of the Matthew F. Maury monument at Belmont and Monument. I can remember how uncool it seemed, at least it did to me. The paint was soon removed; the sand-blasting scars remained noticeable for years.

But there have been other displays. Once Jeff Davis had female clothes, including a bra, fashioned about him. Some said it referred to the legend that he escaped Richmond at the end of the Civil War by dressing up in drag.

To read a piece I wrote about displays of another sort on Monument Avenue, but nonetheless, as political as displays in the public way can get, click here for The Price of Free Speech.

Note: No doubt, these objects won’t stay where you see them but for so long. More news to come…

Posted in Art, Features, Performance, RVANews-news

9 Comments.

  1. Thanks for posting this. I saw the work on the Lee monument this morning since I usually park near there for work and class at VCU. I wanted to go up and get a closer look, but traffic and time were a hindrance. I figured if it was still there tomorrow I’d go look at it.

    Sarah @ February 2nd, 2009 at 2:56 pm

  2. I love the Civil War statues not only because of their dramatic bearing, but also because I grew up a Civil War buff, but I do have a sense of humor. I took a casual shot looking straight up at Jeff Davis during the Easter Parade a few years ago. When I downloaded them I was surprised to discover not only a pigeon sitting on his head, but a can of Dr. Pepper in his outstretched hand.

    IMO we need a few more modern heroes besides Arthur Ashe. Too bad Henrico didn’t bother to carry on the tradition. For that matter it’s too bad Richmond stops at Willow Lawn.

    Paul @ February 2nd, 2009 at 6:30 pm

  3. I just left class around 6:30 and when I walked to my car back on Monument, the candles at the Lee monument had all been lit (although some were already blown out due to the heavy wind that we’re getting right now).

    Sarah @ February 2nd, 2009 at 8:05 pm

  4. Has anyone noticed any new pieces from this series? Any changes in the two that are documented here?

    FTRea @ February 3rd, 2009 at 2:02 pm

  5. This artist behind these works is Keith Mendak. To read more about him, click “Curating the City, Also,” after you follow this link. You’ll also read about other issues raised by public art and the “art of the everyday” in Style Weekly’s annual Midseason Arts Issue this week:

    http://www.tinyurl.com/StyleCover0509

    Jason Roop @ February 3rd, 2009 at 3:17 pm

  6. I left VCU today around 4:30 or 5 today, and the art on the Lee monument was gone, although it was there this morning.

    Sarah @ February 3rd, 2009 at 7:17 pm

  7. Sarah,

    Thanks.

    FTRea @ February 3rd, 2009 at 8:24 pm

  8. I love guerilla art and have enjoyed that installation on the Davis monument. Hey, what about all the bird houses on Hanover? Whats up with them, Terry who knows what up?

    suzanne @ February 3rd, 2009 at 11:20 pm

  9. Suzanne,

    OK, I hope this 2008 post will do:

    http://fdhub.net/49-birdhouses-on-hanover-ave/

    FTRea @ February 4th, 2009 at 1:03 am

3rd Column

RVABlogs »

  • ::
  • ::
  • ::
  • ::
  • ::
Once Upon a Vine