Mayoral race notes

As we enter the Dog Days of 2008’s summer, lazy, hazy, crazy ol’ Richmond is about to be all shook up by stumping candidates. Richmonders will have lots of choices to make when they cast their ballots on November 4.

In each of this city’s nine districts voters will be choosing their representatives on the School Board and City Council. The Fan District is split between two voting districts. Most of it is in the Second, the southern fringe is in the Fifth.

Of course, the citywide race to determine who will be Richmond’s new mayor is going to be stealing the show most of the time. No doubt, what role the sitting mayor might yet play will, from time to time, upstage even the most determined propagandistic efforts of the five mayoral candidates. This mid-July piece will just make a few observations about the contest to elect Richmond’s second strong mayor of the modern era.

So, I’ll start with Paul Goldman, who seems to be in the process of morphing into a local Ralph Nader … of a sort.

Goldman has gotten more news coverage than any of the five in the mayoral race. He’s been busy as a beaver making news. His admirers include some prolific bloggers, so, buzz-wise, Goldman might seem to have succeeded in putting himself on the same level as the perceived front-running threesome — Robert Grey, Dwight Jones and Bill Pantele.

Yes, I am saying that at this point, Lawrence Williams, who had raised zero money through June 30, doesn’t seem to be a factor. Perhaps that will change.

Back to Goldman: With all of his publicity he only raised $3,500 through June 30. Through the same period, Jones took in $130,656, Pantele took in $129,477 and Grey took in $96,100. While an insurgent candidacy like Goldman’s may not need to match his well-heeled opponents, dollar for dollar, in this case the candidate just seems to be gaining no traction outside of his cadre of loyalists.

So, I’m not breaking any news when I say it looks like we’re in store for a three-man race to run City Hall, with Goldman acting as a Nader-like spoiler. If that’s true, the question becomes, who will Goldman hurt the most?

Well, I don’t know the answer.

Another good question is, can anybody carry five districts? Remember, simply getting the most votes isn’t enough. If no candidate carries five of the nine districts, there will be a run-off.

Hey, it’s hardly too late in the summer for Mayor Doug Wilder to have a squirrelly seizure — “meet the new boss, same as the old boss” — and begin hinting he might run for reelection as a write-in candidate.

Posted in Hub's Blurbs, The Slant, RVANews-politics

11 Comments.

  1. I know that Dwight Jones and Goldman are democrats and both endorse Obama but what about Williams, Pantele, and Grey? Who is the most republican of the bunch? Who would make a true civil servant like Warner or Kaine?

    I know when it comes to local politics party affiliations usually don’t matter, however, with this race, knowing this information can help voters make a decision.

    gray @ July 19th, 2008 at 10:14 am

  2. Gray,

    In local political races party affiliations aren’t supposed to be an issue, but nothing happens in a vacuum. So, who is the most loyal Democrat and who is the true Democrat, and who is the most Obamafied Democrat, etc., will all matter in the long run.

    As far your questions go, I’d like to know the answers, but I don’t. I could guess, but I won’t.

    FTRea @ July 19th, 2008 at 10:52 am

  3. Goldman has endorsed Obama as well.

    I find the Nader = ’spoiler’ =Goldman motif irresponsible, erroneous, and insulting to the whole process.

    Scott Burger @ July 19th, 2008 at 5:50 pm

  4. Scott,

    I know you do, because I’ve already read your comments on this topic elsewhere. If you stick with that kind of angry approach, we’ll see how many friends it makes for you. And, we’ll see how many people will turn away from such strident rhetoric.

    Here’s the truth, like it or not: I have not selected a candidate to support in the mayoral race. I’m not even leaning toward any of them. Moreover, I have nothing against Goldman at all.

    Bottom line: I’ve been writing about politics a long time, so, I’m accustomed to partisans trying to bully me. It hasn’t stopped me from calling it like I see it before. Nor will it now.

    FTRea @ July 19th, 2008 at 7:31 pm

  5. 1) Of course you can write whatever you want, but you do have some responsibility to be accurate in your reporting.
    2) Calling Goldman a “Nader-like spoiler” sounds like partisan bullying to me. I urge you to re-evaluate the loaded terms.
    3) This is more about principle than a popularity contest.

    Scott Burger @ July 21st, 2008 at 10:13 pm

  6. Scott,

    Please note, I’m a writer not an activist. So, I won’t let you take any words away from me.

    “Spoiler” is a term that I believe migrated from baseball to politics. In baseball, it refers to a team that is out of the running for the pennant, but by beating teams still in the hunt it can determine the eventual winner.

    As far as Nader is concerned (we’ve been through this before), I’ve never blamed Nader for Gore’s loss. Gore’s failure was his own fault. But, in retrospect, it’s fair and accurate to refer to the role Nader played in that election year as that of a “spoiler.”

    That term may rub you the wrong way, but by angrily insisting it’s wrong, wrong, WRONG, I don’t believe you are changing many minds.

    To refresh your memory, I have all the respect in the world for Ralph Nader’s outstanding contributions over decades, as a consumer advocate. He’s been a hero of mine.

    But I don’t think Nader serves any good cause by continuing to declare himself a presidential candidate every four years.

    FTRea @ July 22nd, 2008 at 9:52 am

  7. Maybe you should leave “baseball terms” out of your non-activist political writing then.

    Calling Nader and Goldman spoilers is inaccurate because, by your own logic above, neither of them are determining eventual winners.

    I will stand by my judgment that this is in fact partisan bullying. You are welcome to disagree.

    Speaking of partisanship, what is going on with the City Democratic Party’s endorsement process for mayoral candidates?

    Scott Burger @ July 23rd, 2008 at 6:27 am

  8. Scott,

    Maybe you should consider that the hammer is not the best tool for every job.

    FTRea @ July 23rd, 2008 at 9:50 am

  9. Scott, I think the Richmond Democratic Party will endorse Dwight Jones. That is my guess.

    Scott and FTRea, There is a huge chance that Pantele and Grey will be the ones taking votes from eachother.

    Goldman is the independent.

    I don’t know where Lawrence Williams falls but I do like his idea of placing the jail house next to Phillip Morris.

    gray @ July 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 pm

  10. I had the opportunity to meet with Bob Grey tonight. What an impressive man! He has been a community leader in his younger days with the Richmond Crusade for Voters, a regional leader with the Chamber, and a national leader with the American Bar Association. He is committed to maintaining our strong mayor system - my understanding is that the other candidates favor a stronger Council. I’m convinced. Robert Grey is the man!!

    BTW - Wilder was there sporting a handsome goatee (sp?) and he certainly gave the impression that he thought Grey was the one to carry on the strong mayor system. There were several other local elected officials and some heavy hitters from the community present. Remember that the General Assembly can consider charter changes during the next Mayor’s term. We don’t want to return to a strong council, in my opinion.

    Ram Fan @ July 23rd, 2008 at 9:28 pm

  11. Bob Grey brags about “rescuing the downtown arts center deal”. I would not be bragging if I was him:

    http://saverichmond.com/

    Scott Burger @ July 23rd, 2008 at 10:25 pm

3rd Column

RVABlogs »

Once Upon a Vine
-->