Are Our Schools Better Off Today?

Are Our Schools Better Off Today? Where Do We Go From Here?

By Carol A.O. Wolf

The late and great Oliver W. Hill, Esq. was my friend and mentor for the past 25 years and my most valued and vocal constituent for the past six.

Thanks to Mr. Hill’s inspiration, unyielding expectations of excellence, and the unfortunate fact of his blindness, I received a most special education as one of his privileged “readers.”

“We” read every word of Simple Justice, Richard Kluger’s 798-page legal history of the Brown vs. Board of Education case and subsequent legal decisions. Several times.

To be sure, over the years, we read many other books, including Mr. Hill’s autobiography, The Big Bang: Brown v. Board of Education, and countless legal and political articles. But, we always returned to Kluger’s Simple Justice.

On our third time or fourth time through, I asked why we were re-reading it. His answer was, as always, honest and direct: “Because we are not finished yet. We’ve barely begun.”

And, it was on that day, when I finally “got” what he meant, that he exacted the only promise he ever asked of me. “Do not ever engage in a discussion of the re-segregation of Richmond’s schools – they’ve never been de-segregated.”

Since Mr. Hill and I had ongoing discussions of whether our schools were better because of Brown and what he thought we needed to do to fix them, I feel safe proffering the following answers:
Short answer: No. Our schools are not better off.

Mr. Hill often stated that it was a “sad fact” that although the Warren Court used the Nine-to-Nuthin’ Brown Decision to open the front doors of the schoolhouses of k-12 education, Richard Nixon’s appointment of William H. Rehnquist and Richmond’s own Lewis F. Powell, Jr., to the U.S. Supreme Court helped render the Five-to-Four Milliken Decision (July 25, 1974) which essentially gave those schoolhouses legal back doors for great masses of the white and black middle class to escape the problems of our nation’s cities in favor of life in the suburbs.

In his dissent to the Milliken Decision, Justice Thurgood Marshall noted that poor Negro children would continue to receive “the same inherently unequal education in the future as they have been unconstitutionally afforded in the past.” Justice Marshall further noted that “In the short run, it may seem to be the easier course to allow our great metropolitan areas to be divided up each into cities — one white, the other black — but it is a course, I predict, our people will ultimately regret.”

Those who knew Mr. Hill well know that he was not a man given to recriminations. He maintained a cordial “Virginia Gentleman” relationship with Justice Powell. Yet Mr. Hill dryly noted on many occasions that, even though Powell, as chairman of the Richmond School Board, had not supported Virginia’s “massive resistance” to school integration, the board under Powell’s leadership did nothing to integrate Richmond’s schools. In 1961 when Powell stepped down as school board chairman, “precisely two black children” attended school with white students in the city.

Ironically, compared to what it didn’t do for public k-12 education, Brown actually flung open the doors of higher education for African-Americans and for women as evidenced by ever increasing numbers of accomplished and successful attorneys, doctors, business leaders, educators, scientists, authors, journalists and, yes, politicians. Still, we have far more African-American males in our prisons than in our colleges and universities.

Richmond’s problems are not unique. All one has to do is read the newspaper of any major city in this nation to see that we all share the same urgent and sad challenges.

Despite dramatic academic progress and the real and hard-won achievements of dedicated teachers, students and families, we still have a shameful graduation rate, an abysmal dropout rate, sky-rocketing out-of-school suspension rates, and virtual total non-compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, thus denying “simple access” to our one in six citizens with disabilities.

Where do we go from here?

Before anyone goes crazy enacting NCLB sanctions and dismantling public education as we know it and the good people of our nation intend it, I suggest we revisit the Milliken decision and reconsider not only what Richmond and the region, but what the rest of our nation’s cities, might be like today had that decision gone the other way. Can we find a way to recapture that missed opportunity for equality?

We can all begin by re-reading Simple Justice. Why?

As Mr. Hill said: “Because we are not finished yet. We’ve barely begun.”

*

Ed Note: Carol Wolf posted this piece as part of her comment to my post about the new civil rights monument to be unveiled on Monday. It is reprinted here with the author’s permission. An excerpt of it was previously published by the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

Posted in Hub's Blurbs, RVANews-politics, Schools

16 Comments.

  1. What will it take to bring Richmond’s black and white middle class back into our public schools?

    Carol A.O. Wolf @ July 21st, 2008 at 3:01 pm

  2. Carol,

    Today at the Civil Rights Memorial unveiling ceremony, Gov. Tim Kaine reminded those gathered of the photographs of his wife, as a little girl, being led to a public school by her father — Linwood Holton, who was then the sitting governor. Kaine and others were speaking of how the new monument is about children and for children.

    What would it take to bring Richmond’s middle class back?

    Leadership is where it would have to start. How many leaders — political, business, religious, etc. — in Richmond are currently sending their children to public schools?

    FTRea @ July 21st, 2008 at 3:14 pm

  3. The City government has neglected the school buildings. I am not denying class/race elements of the situation, yet the bigger truth is that downtown schemes like Sixth Street Marketplace and the arts center/Center Stage always seem to get pushed through while school buildings are still moldering. Loans and handouts are fast forwarded to developers while ADA and computer technology is left wanting. Its been that way for years. The City’s priorities are right there in the open, evident to anyone who wants to see. Unless the priorities change, I cannot blame parents who leave the City for better schools elsewhere. Its up to citizens to DEMAND better. And yes, its good to also recognize that this may not be so much a money issue (there is no doubt there is a lot of money wasted in the RPS system) as it is an attention issue.

    Rea, you want to know what really makes me angry, this is it. I will spare you the whole rant, but there are a lot of Richmond leaders that share the blame, including Kaine.

    Scott Burger @ July 21st, 2008 at 10:34 pm

  4. Scott,

    Sorry, in public affairs/politics, I’m tired of my-way-or-no-way-style DEMANDS. Activists, or leaders, who demand total agreement may mean well. But they don’t always serve their cause so well.

    FTRea @ July 22nd, 2008 at 12:27 am

  5. There is always room for listening and compromise, but unless you have your priorities in order, you risk capitulation.

    My point is that Richmond still needs to get its priorities in order. School buildings should not play second fiddle to corporate welfare and vanity projects.

    Scott Burger @ July 22nd, 2008 at 1:38 am

  6. “If all the rich and all of the church people should send their children to the public schools they would feel bound to concentrate their money on improving these schools until they met the highest ideals.” ~ Susan B. Anthony

    Susan B. Anthony’s quote above pretty much nails it. And, Scott is right about the need for the School Board, City Council and the Mayor to get their priorities straight. The city has money for a $25 million opera house, money for a new UR stadium, money for VCU to do whatever it wants whenever it wants.

    Separate and unequal facilities continue to exist in Richmond. And, I am not just talking about ADA compliance. With precious few exceptions, our children have dilapidated school buildings, lousy athletic facilities, antiquated heating and cooling systems, nearly non-existent landscaping.

    As Mr. Hill noted: “We’ve barely begun.”

    All that has happened in Richmond is that we have simply gone from a “de jure” to a “de facto” segregation situation.

    Carol A.O. Wolf @ July 22nd, 2008 at 8:39 am

  7. When will the citizens of Richmond who opt out of the Richmond Public Schools awaken and realize that their payments for private/parochial educations for their children constitute a HUGE TAX, far greater than the infamous “car tax,” far greater than the proposed tax for improved transit/transporation systems?

    Do the math folks. Non-RPS families are paying twice — once for their city taxes, once for their tuition “tax.”

    GetRealRichmond @ July 22nd, 2008 at 11:13 am

  8. Get rid of the neocon educational policies, inept leadership downtown and in the school houses, and stop it with the heaps of multiple choice worksheets and tests if you want anyone with a little means and a way out to use the poor urban public schools. I’m not talking about Mary Munford or Holton, the schools that retain their teachers and do a little more than multiple choice worksheets.

    gray @ July 22nd, 2008 at 9:18 pm

  9. Regarding Susan B. Anthony’s quote:

    What about the schools without a wealthy neighborhood within their zone? The rich won’t go to an out-of-zone poor school. Maybe there wasn’t in-zone and mega-zone lines drawn in her time.

    gray @ July 22nd, 2008 at 9:50 pm

  10. True, Susab B. never contended with in-zone, outta-zone, mega-zone, Twillight Zone nonsense of Richmond Public Schools. She fought for abolition of slavery and for a woman’s right to vote.

    What happens in the classroom should not be dependent on how wealthy a neighborhood is or is not.

    I would love to see just how much money each school in RPS receives. One of the biggest differences in schools is that some PTAs absolutely rock when it comes to raising money that benefits all children in the school. And, others simply don’t. Wouldn’t it be nice if the powerhouse PTAs could “mentor” the weaker/poorer PTAs?

    GetRealRichmond @ July 22nd, 2008 at 11:06 pm

  11. We could ask powerhouse PTAs for money but I think it is the job of government to properly fund public education instead of punishing the poorer schools. We spend how many billions/trillions on a war for Haliburton? I think Bush wants schools to sink that aren’t finacially supported by parents or privatized. The last thing the neocon government wants to support, other than welfare, is public education.

    I say as a city we do not strictly adhere to Washington’s policies and take the federal money and distribute it more fairly. The way the public education system is set up now is like giving tax cuts to the rich.

    However, GetReal, I do think it would be a good idea to join schools PTAs to help out eachother and to invite children from neighboring schools into their cool after school programs or to share the Acelerated Reading lists, etc. I’ve heard that it takes twelve dedicated people in a PTA to get the ball rolling.

    gray @ July 23rd, 2008 at 2:31 am

  12. I wasn’t suggesting that the “Powerhouse PTAs” give money to the other PTAs.

    My thought was that they share expertise and provide inspiration.

    A variation on the old adage about giving how if you give a hungry [man, woman, child] a fish, they can eat one day. But, if you teach someone how to fish, they never need to go hungry again.

    GetRealRichmond @ July 23rd, 2008 at 8:01 am

  13. Sharing expertise would be great. Also PTAs with very little parental involvement like in the east end schools should collaberate with eachother and share their resources.

    Some of these “Powerhouse PTAs” are making mad money like well over $100,000 in a school year. It takes wealthy folk to make that kind of money. This is where the government should step in and help the poorer schools that might not even have one working computer in a classroom or a single after school program other than tutoring on more SOL crap. And think of the field trips poor kids miss out on -kids that have never even left their neighborhoods- while the wealthy children with plenty of travel experience gain more in their wealthy schools.

    I spoke with a Dutch friend and he said that their schools have no need for PTAs and that all schools offer the same educational opportunities. This is the way it was when I was a child -what was being offered at my poor to middle class school was no different than the rich school across town. And even today you can see this in parts of Henrico. My sister-in-law’s blue collar school in Glen Allen has the same programs as my friend’s wealthy school in Tuckahoe.

    gray @ July 23rd, 2008 at 10:02 am

  14. “What will it take to bring Richmond’s black and white middle class back into our public schools?”

    At the pool this summer there has been a lot of talk about public schooling and I’ve spoken to many families who are leaving public education altogether. Why? Because everything is about the SOLs and public education has become militant. One parent said that her daughter is doing okay at Fox but not thriving. Another parent said, after struggling to get her youngest son into Albert Hill, that if she had to do it all over again, she would not send her kids to RPS (all three of her children are in RPS on up to high school). Many are leaving public education for reggio emilia and montessori programs.

    Below is a quote from a James River Maven blog and a comment I left with it:

    “We haven’t even begun to think about whether the SOL-based education that we give our children will prepare them for the 21st Century issues they will face as adults.”

    This is the biggest issue we face. The teaching to the multiple choice test is robbing our children of an education and not preparing them for the real world. I had a conversation with a veteran RPS teacher yesterday about the multiple choice tests -how downtown is demanding that the teachers use them over other testing measures and how the good grades our children are receiving are not reflecting what they really know or understand. I told this teacher that I feel they are lying to us and before I could even finish my sentence, the teacher said, “they are,” and that my concern was, “valid.”

    https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35977419&postID=3766786335079411771

    gray @ July 23rd, 2008 at 10:26 pm

  15. Please paste this web address —

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U

    in your browser and let me know what you think.

    Thanks!

    Carol A.O. Wolf @ July 24th, 2008 at 12:12 pm

  16. Carol Wolf,

    Thank you for sharing that. It is right on the mark and is a huge topic of conversation in schools like the Orchard House School.

    There are individual students prepared for the 21st century in RPS, especially those that attend the specialty schools like the Governors, IB programs, or schools lead by exceptional principals like Mr. Hudson at Holton , however, in most poor schools, children without educated parent advocates will be deprived of a progressive education. From what I have seen and witnessed in several predominately poor RPS, you would think that they were preparing children for prison or military service. All the multiple choice worksheets and tests are not teaching our children the skills necessary for problem solving, analytical or creative thinking, or the real world. At best, the multiple choice tests are rearing little consumers who will be able to hit the cereal aisle and make a choice.

    gray @ July 24th, 2008 at 1:00 pm

3rd Column

Once Upon a Vine